|
Zero
is not the Only Story
|
|
|
by
P. Priyadarshi
|
| |
|
|

Price:
Rs. 400
Pages:
248, ISBN 81-89072-14-5
|
|
CONTENTS
|
| |
Foreword
by Dina Nath Mishra
Founder
President
India
First Foundation
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Indian Mathematics
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
Indian Astronomy
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Cosmology:
Origin of Universe
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
Indian
Physics
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Chemistry
in Ancient and Medieval India
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
Indian
Medicine
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
Psychology
in Ancient India and its Influence
on Modern Psychology
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
Biological
Sciences in Ancient India |
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Bibliograbhy |
213
|
| |
|
|
228
|
| |
|
Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
India's
English education system was designed by Lord
T.B. Macaulay so as to crush Indian pride and
to belittle their self-esteem in every sphere
of life. His oft repeated following quote is self-evident:
"Entire Indian wisdom is not even worth of
a small Almirah of books in any European home
and the knowledge contained in the entire Indian
literature is not even of the level that is found
even in the elementary school books." He
literally succeeded in his objective. His efforts
were supplemented by Karl Marx and their followers.
Marx too had very low opinion about 'stagnant'
Indian civilization, fit only to be conquered
by foreigners.
Britishers
had a vested interest in creating generations
of brown sahibs for continuance of their rule.
Even during the interlude after demolition of
scores of theories and researches, the negationist
approach of a large section of intelligentsia
remained forzen in tune with Macaulay's opinion.
But some great opinion leaders like Dayanand Saraswati,
Vivekananda and their ilk in the 19th century
and Lal, Bal, Pal, Mahatma Gandhi, Dr. Hedgevar
and scores of well-read, knowledgeable freedom
fighters remained convinced about rich Indian
cultural heritage. Even 50 years after independence,
confusion about Indian pride remained. In last
two decades of 20lh century, symptoms of Indian
greatness started appearing and surfaced among
Indian Diaspora, especially in the field of science,
technology and various other branches of learning.
With the advent of 2181 century, though the economic
rise of India is being seen and acknowledged but
its comparison with the country of beggars, snake
charmers, illiterates and poverty-ridden masses
persisted.
When
Britishers ruled India in 181h_19th century, even
then the whole world was not thinking in line
with British-American propaganda.Many prominent
thinkers and scholars thought otherwise: French
scholar Romain Rolland said: "If there is
one place on the face of earth where all the dreams
of living men have found a home from the very
earliest days when man began the dream of existence,
it is India." Albert Einstein said, "We
owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to
count, without which no worthwhile scientific
discovery could have been made." Hu Shih,
former Ambassador of China to USA said, "India
conquered and dominated China culturally for 20
centuries without ever having to send a single
soldier across her border."
There
have been conscious efforts to deny ancient Indian
contribution related to the modem sciences. Racial
considerations, prejudices and ignorance are the
main reasons behind this discrimination. Travellers
like Al-baruni, Huen-sang and dozens of others,
have written about great Indian civilization and
its achievements. When many cultures were only
nomadic forest dwellers over 5000 years ago, Indians
established Harappan culture in Sindhu Valley
(Indus Valley Civilization).
I
was fully convinced about ancient Indian scientific
achievements. There have been number of books
on the subject detailing great Indian scientific
heritage. I was in search of a scholar who could
write with authority on the subject. Our Research
Director Shri R.N .P. Singh succeeded in finding
Dr. P. Priyadarshi M.B.B.S MRCP (U.K), a practicing
physician in London for quite long. What is more
important about Dr. Priyadarshi is that he belongs
to Sanskrit scholars family tree of Mithila and
despite being busy in his medical practice, he
studied, history, philosophy, anthropology and
other branches of learning. As Zero is universally
acknowledged contribution of Indian mind, the
title of the book 'Zero is not the only story',
obviously, is very much appropriate.
Dina
Nath Mishra
Founder
President
India
First Foundation
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
For
a long time, many historians have ignored the
role of ancient Indian civilization in the origin
and development of science. They have made passing
remarks to Indian invention of zero as if India's
contribution to science is zero. And even title
to zero was conceded to India after a long period
of denial.[1] Some eminent persons have even researched as to
why India did not have the 'scientific edge'.
Some have invented that the ancient Indians were
fatalist, gave more importance to afterlife and
therefore did very little to know this world and
wasted their energies in rituals and religion.
Some others have conjectured that class divisions
and class struggles consumed all the creative
energies of the ancient Indians and blocked their
mental faculties for science.
But
when we look at the really advanced state of science
in ancient India in light of available evidences,
all such conjectures appear to have been made
either because of ignorance or because of motive
to suppress the facts regarding the advanced state
of science in ancient India. Because of such a
malicious campaign by a few, ancient Indian surviving
texts have not been fully exploited by those who
have knowledge and understanding of science. Even
the exclusively scientific texts like the Vaisheshika
Sutras have been translated and commented
upon by scholars of Sanskrit language, but not
by men of science. However, there have been quite
a few Western students of science recently, both
of Indian as well as European origin, who have
paid attention to the facts of science mentioned
in the ancient Indian texts.
India
was world leader in science, mathematics, architecture,
linguistics and trade during her ancient years.[2]
India was ahead of all civilizations in science
and mathematics till the twelfth century, when
Indian centers of excellence in science and
mathematics were destroyed by invading foreign
troops most well known of them being one led
by Bakhtiar Khilji. In the very beginning, China
held the second position in science for a good
length of time. Greece held the second position
for a couple of centuries before being destroyed
by the Romans. Then Greek colony of Alexandria
in Egypt held the second position in knowledge
for several centuries before being destroyed
completely in 642 A.D. by Caliph Omar. Mter
the Indian scientist Kanaka started a revolution
in science and mathematics at Baghdad, Arabs
emerged the patrons of mathematics and science
till they were invaded by the Mongols who destroyed
much of the Islamic civilization in 1258.
Nineth
century onwards, Europe started getting trickle
of science and mathematics from the Arabs. The
transfer of knowledge from Arabic language to
Europe in Latin translation was complete by
the end of sixteenth century. After that time
it has been the West that occupied the leading
position in science and mathematics. But even
between the twelfth and the sixteenth centuries,
Indians commanded supremacy in many branches
of science, medicine especially plastic surgery
being one of them.
It
is a fact that much of ancient Indian history
remained unknown until recently, and even now
some new facts are being uncovered everyday.
A couple of centuries back, not much of the
ancient histories of the countries which had
been under Islamic rule like Egypt, Arabia,
Mesopotamia, Iran, Central Asia, Afghanistan
and India was known. The systematic histories
of these countries were available only since
the Muslim periods of these countries. The pre-Muslim
fragments of history of these nations existed
in a heavily adulterated or spurious form as
folklores, fictional literature or as an admixture
of religion and mythology. The ancient Egyptians
were fortunate enough to have made pyramids
within which their history could survive the
destruction from invasions. The ancient Sumerians
and the Babylonians had written enough history
carved on stone, which could be deciphered by
the European linguists and archeologists later.
But
unfortunately the ancient Indians did not make
pyramids. Two centuries back we had only a few
texts surviving from ancient days of India.
Little of secular literature had survived in
India except texts of medicine preserved in
the homes of medical practitioners, astronomical
texts preserved in the homes of the private
practitioners of astrology, and pure literature
kept by the gentry in villages and towns. Literature
of religious significance survived because it
was widely spread in the homes of the religious
professionals and also memorized verbatim. None
of that literature, which was of academic importance
kept in libraries, could survive the onslaught
of the invaders. Therefore no text of real science
or history had survived the several centuries
of alien rule in India.
However,
such invaders could not bring the history of
the ancient people of Indian to a permanent
extinction. Indian Buddhist missionaries as
well as foreigner Buddhist travellers to India
had taken huge piles of Indian historical texts
relevant to their religion to cobtries like
Tibet, China, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar. In the
process of reconstructing the history of ancient
India, such texts especially Sri Lankan Buddhist
cannons were extremely helpful, and the British
made valuable contribution to this work. The
archeological excavation and the deciphering
of the ancient Indian rock inscriptions led
by the British went a long way in contributing
to the knowledge of ancient Indian history.
The British also took ingenious interest in
discovering and translating many ancient manuscripts
like the Kautilya's Arthashastra, the
Bakshali Manuscript and the Bower Manuscript.
We
now have a fairly reasonable account of the
political history of ancient India going back
up to the days of Buddha. Probably the people
of the Buddhist countries were not interested
in Indian history prior to Buddha and therefore
they did not preserve any history of India before
Buddha's times. That is precisely the reason
why systematic history of India stops at Buddha.
Although
political history got priority over other histories
earlier, recently a fresh interest in India's
past sciences has been generated. It is now
widely accepted that the Pythagoras's Theorem
was present in India as Baudhayana Shulva-sutra
at a much earlier date than Pythagoras.
Paniani who never wrote anything on mathematics
has been accorded a status of mathematician
because of mathematical nature of the grammar
of Sanskrit language (I.J.O'Conner). The Backus
Normal Fonn (BNF, Backus Naur Fonn), which is
the very basic of all computer language, has
been found in the Panini's Sanskrit grammar
and has been widely renamed as Panini-Backus
Fonn (Ingennan). The binary number system which
fonDS the basis for entering all computer data
was described in the book of prosody by Pingala
(c. 200 B.C.) in India about fourteen centuries
before the West.[3]
Pingala also gives the method of converting
the decimal numbers into binary and vice-versa.[4] Because of the fact that the BNF and the binary
system, and many other such basic computer concepts
were discovered in ancient India, there is now
talk of "computing science" in ancient
India.[5] Vedic hymns have been
interpreted by Western scientists in the light
of modem science; and a lot of scientific truths
of the Vedas are now agreed upon by all. Most
of Indian sciences have not survived, but their
references in various non-science literature
enable us to fonD an idea of what Indian sciences
might have looked like.
Another
much less known fact needs to be emphasized
that the ancient Indian sciences directly stimulated
the European interest in science when they reached
Europe after being translated twice-into Arabic
and thence into Latin. Such transfers of knowledge
must have occurred in ancient period also about
which there are only stray references.
It
is desirable to borrow a concept from Western
medicine into history writing-the concept of
the Evidence Based Medicine. I would like to
say that history should also be evidence based.
It should not be based on convictions of historians
who matter or their schools. No individual's
openion is superior to the evidence of fact.
Individual imaginations have so far distorted
Indian history, and the fact is that what we
get today as history of ancient India is in
fact largely ancient India as imagined by the
powerful historians. This trend needs to be
replaced by the Evidence Based History.
I
have tried to present an outline of the science
in ancient India and to some extent medieval
India, as I could gather. But it is just an
outline and further deeper studies by scientific
community are desirable. This work could not
have been possible without encouragement, guidance
and help of several people. First of all I am
grateful to Mr R. N. P. Singh, Director, India
First Foundation who considered me suitable
for the project and introduced me to Shri Dina
Nath Mishra, Founder President of the foundation.
Whenever I became slow in the work, it was Mr
Singh's telephone call that reactivated me.
His guidance was of enormous help to me.. I
am heavily indebted to Shri Dina Nath Mishra
on several accounts. His love and affection
always remained a force behind my work. He suggested
the project to me and extended all support.
The title of the book bears the mark of his
genius. Without his support this work could
not have been completed.
Prof.
Makkhan Lal not only gave me a valuable list
of select bibliography in the very beginning
but also gave me photoc!)pies of some of the
valuable articles from his personal collection.
He was always available to me on telephone and
gave time personally to guide me through the
work. He took pains to go through the manuscript
and gave valuable suggestions in nearly all
the chapters. I am deeply indebted to him. I
am thankful to Mr Ram Naresh Sharma who took
pains to find out copies of the Vaisheshika
Sutras and the Samkhya philosophy
from Varanasi. He as well as my sister Prof.
Jayashri Mishra, Pofessor of History, Magadh
Mahila College, Patna University gave valuable
advice from time to time. My maternal uncle
Shri Raghunath Prasad Singh was of enormous
help in clarifying meanings of many Sanskrit
words and verses. I am also indebted to Dr Madhusudan
Mishra, former Director, Rashtriya Sanskrit
Sansthan, Mr Mohinder Vashishtha of Standard
Publishers, Dr R. Kumar, psychiatrist, Dr Gaur,
Registrar, Rashtriya Sansakrit Samsthan and
Mr Mahesh Chandra of Sanskritik Gaurav Sansthan.
I also thank Kanhaiya, Mamta, Deepa, Santosh,
Mrs Tanuja Sharma, Miss Bhawana Gupta, Dr Sukant
Ghosh, Dr Ram Nath. I also wish to thank Mr
Prabhat Kumar of Prabhat Prakashan and his staff
member Mr Sarvesh for printing. At the end I
wish to thank my wife Alka Singh and daughter
Sneha for always encouraging me whenever I felt
tired, and for never resenting my not giving
enough time to them.
P.
Priyadarshi
[1] Basham, A.L.; The Wonder that was
India, Part I, Rupa & Co., Bombay, 1999,
p. 495 and Duncan, D. E.; The Calanda1; Fourth
Estate, London, 1999, p. 166.
[2] Duncan, D. E, The Calendel; Forth
Estate, London p. 152.
[3] Van Nooten, B.; Binary numbers in Indian
Antiquity, J. of Indian Studies, Vol.
21, 31-50,1993. Republished in Rao, T. R. N.
and Kak S. (Eds.), op. cit.
[4] Pingala, Chandahsutra, 8.24-25.
[5] Rao, T. R. N. and Kak, S. (Eds.); Computing
science in Ancient India, Center for Advanced
Computer Studies, University of Southwestern
Louisiana, 1998. Republished by Munshiram Manoharlal,
New Delhi, 2000.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|